| special
animal rescue report
Pride,
Poison and Prejudice around the Parthenon.
Part
3 - Backgrounds of Greece and other countries cited as cruel to animals
(For
Part 1 of this 3 part report click here)
John O'Donnell
takes a pragmatic journey around Greece and other countries cited
for animal cruelty to examine how they are viewed through the international
media and from inside their own borders. Also, how history and "cultural
logic" determine the different relationships that nations of opposites
have towards their animals.
Xenophobia
for Dummies
The UK, America
and parts of Western Europe often provide accounts on countries traditionally
portrayed as uncompassionate towards animals, both through the media
and more recently through the web. But do such negative preconceptions
towards proud nations cause cultural backfire and resentment from inside
the accused country? If so "cause and effect" is something to consider
- not only in surveying a society by its mistreatment of animals but
understanding how such treatment is inherently imprinted into the roots
of its culture.
Ghandi once said, "You can see the grandeur and the moral progress of
a nation by the way it treats its animals''. But cultural imprinting
is just one view that needs to be addressed more carefully when trying
to improve states of welfare in foreign places.
In fact, animal welfare parallels many aspects of how different societies
can evolve a debased view of each other - through lack of patience and
understanding.
What historically carves such different cultural paths around the world
is a complex and delicate issue - and how the global community thinks
it should alter these paths can cause a great deal of contention. Even
if the purpose to instigate change is for the good of animals and people,
many countries simply don't want to feel patronised by the directives
of the outside world. Such blatant interference can lead to a backfire
from the old school elements of societies who cherish even their more
distasteful traditions. And so it may still take many generations of
education to turn the world into a unified way of compassionate thinking.
In the meantime, xenophobia and pride are emotions that barely lie beneath
the surface of most nations throughout the world. Political diplomacy
might well shield such feelings to a point, but it's no more than a
psychological concealment of intolerance, mistrust and arrogance - and
a very fragile one too.
Governments are very good at dressing up xenophobia under the banner
of "international relations" and some can play the diplomatic hand very
confidently. Others however may express intolerance openly and passionately.
For example, recent events between strident American led forces and
religiously complex Islamic countries show how national pride and misunderstood
cultural approaches can cause nations to become totally dismissive of
common-sense solutions. Failure to absolve social differences can cloud
any constructive dialogue between countries, and this in turn affects
the confidence of both controlling and domestic authorities … and squabbling
citizens. Deception and irrational finger-pointing can take over, and
a situation deteriorates worse than before.
Humanitarian injustice
is a subject that tends to be contained within a political arena more
than animal welfare issues. It's seen as a matter of diplomatic based
argument and so the general public feels less emotionally attached to
the issue when we are informed by the media about war and atrocities in
far away places. After all, it's a subject dealing with turmoil between
the same species (humans), and so we instinctively gauge our emotions
on how it affects our personal space between one human and another. In
fact, this is where it's easy to detect an element of jingoism bubbling
underneath a veil of polite sympathy - and that's why prejudice in every
society - and from one culture to another - is never far away.
So how does animal
welfare come into all this?
Animal cruelty is
something every society can recognise as a universal emotion. It has
no relation to inter-human reaction. In other words, it's nonlinear
to people-over people power.
However, we instantly recognise that an animal's suffering is caused
by the humans it shares its space with. We feel an emotion towards animals
in distress - particularly companion animals like cats and dogs - however
far away the suffering may be. It affects us on a more personal level
because we tend to empathise with the suffering of all companion animals
equally, wherever they are in the world - i.e. … either seeing a dog
being bludgeoned to death on TV or stroking our own sick cat sitting
on our lap. When we see that a country is mistreating these kinds of
animals we can quickly feel impartial towards its entire people. In
effect, we are accusing an entire culture and this reflects a short-sighted
judgement, revealing a common layer of prejudice.
But in some cases, animal treatment through traditions that we consider
blatantly cruel, is often part of religion-based lifestyles that will
resist criticism from outside and therefore rarely consider change.
So how is international
intolerance felt and viewed from inside the accused country?
What causes a country's mistreatment towards the treatment of domestic
animals?
This is how we begin this journey; to determine the different relationships
that nations of opposites have towards their animals.
Olympic
strays ran for their lives ... and lost.
From a western tourist's
point of view, the countries and islands of the Mediterranean are always
a good place to start; traditionally notorious for the mistreatment
of domestic animals.
In the case of international impartiality towards Greece and its animal
welfare record - a country passionately driven by national pride and
tradition - there is currently a gloomy scenario that now leaves its
stray dog and cat population fighting for its life... and with no easy
way of escape.
In 2004, world attention had turned towards Greece as Olympic hosts.
This triggered the usual flurry of UK and international press reports
on the treatment of the huge stray animal problem found on the streets
of Athens and other towns across the country and its islands. Infamous
for this topic that never seems to go away, there was concern amongst
some Greeks that its entire people might be tarred with the same brush
by the international community.
In fact, there were and still are numerous native Greek animal rescue
groups who are working tirelessly to stamp out animal cruelty in their
country for good. But because poisoning and neglect is still widespread
- particularly prior to that August, as thousands had been poisoned
around the Olympic venues - the groups continued their battle with their
own obstructive authorities as they attempted to fly out those they
have rescued to loving homes abroad.
And while these good Samaritans dedicate themselves to a great cause,
Greek reactionaries scoff at such deeds of compassion; Superstition,
ingrained tradition and pride dictates to them that being seen as instigators
of animal cruelty reveals flaws and failings within their cultural make-up.
This jingoistic attitude goes as far as attempting to smear the country's
own do-gooders with false accusations.
Such mentality caused turmoil amongst Greek animal welfare groups, the
country's media and an easily misinformed population … who will initially
prefer to side with the notion - however false - that doesn't show its
culture to be synonymously tied with animal cruelty. It's on this basis
that an innocent Greek rescue worker along with three foreigners had
been falsely accused of trafficking animals for fur and vivisection
and receiving payments from international sources. (see
part one) By believing this accusation, the Greek public
showed that they would rather go with a story that fits in better with
the desire to drive an optimistic merry-go-round of patriotism rather
than get to the truth. The truth being that the accused in question,
along with many of their own rescue groups were desperately trying to
transport neglected Greek animals to countries who would give them a
caring home - again a truth which any highly patriotic country might
not feel so comfortable at accepting.
Regions like the
Mediterranean bask in climates that provide ideal conditions for dogs
and cats to live outside and breed throughout the year. Initially, this
is why so many animals gather around populated areas, where scraps of
food or the occasional hand-out might be found. This gives more reason
why authorities should exercise humane, no-kill methods to control their
numbers, and at the same time provide proper education to its citizens
about compassionate responsibility and care towards their animals.
Godzilla
versus the Medusa
Traditions, myths,
superstition and religions of opposite world cultures have undoubtedly
carved the differences, which either favour or disregard certain animal
species. But it's only when you explore a country's history that you discover
inherent links that reveal the source of its current social behaviour
towards animals. With cultural contrasts in mind, there's no finer example
than Greece when compared to a country like Japan.
The writings of ancient Greek scholars offer a wealth of animal related
stories, and one creature most favoured amongst its peoples was the dolphin.
In mythology, Odysseus worshiped them, Poseidon loved them and Amphitrite
was the "mother" of them. There are also stories of wondrous deeds done
by dolphins (believed to be nearly or equally as "intelligent" as man),
that saved the lives of Greek villagers and mariners. Today these mammals
are the subject of conservation programmes all around the Greek islands
of the Agean sea. In Japan however, dolphins have never received such
affection, and along with endangered whales, around 20,000 are slaughtered
each year off the Japanese coasts. In stark irony, the Japanese are mad
on dogs and there's a roaring trade in expensive pooches, particularly
the miniature variety because of their apparent Pokemon-style cuteness
- cute being a favourite Japanese passion.
Japan is also quick to point out that dog is not on their culinary menu
- although dolphin is … it's sold as pet food to feed their dogs.
But while dolphins
have been protected in Greece, its history illustrates a mixed relationship
with dogs, ultimately describing them as no more than a commodity for
religious sacrifice. Some Greek legends portray dogs with intuition and
healing powers, and Homer's writings indicate that he acknowledged canines
with a fair share of empathy. There are in fact two aspects of how Greeks
viewed dogs. Based on Homer's Odyssey, Greeks were highly encouraged to
cherish their dogs.
But more overwhelmingly, dogs were an important part of Greek religion
and considered sacrificial. Because of this they were allowed to breed
freely, then harvested and killed for sacrifice. This became increasingly
common, because dogs were cheap and very easy to come by, and so they
were regarded as a commodity or a house guard rather than a four legged
companion.
These two roles of dogs in early Greek culture may explain the paradox
in modern Greece. Many modern Greeks are animal lovers, but usually there's
a degree of age-old superstition attached. This may also explain why many
Greek pet owners refuse to have their animals neutered because they believe
they should enjoy a sex life. In fact, animal euthanasia is technically
illegal in Greece, which sounds fine until you begin to discover the secret
culling of street animals in their thousands.
But there is no doubt that the legacy of twisted customs and superstitions
rooted into Greek folklore is widely evident on the streets to this day,
a cultural stain which some Greeks, who appear to belong to an unknown
administration, were determined to make invisible around the Olympic arenas,
through systematic poisoning of its strays.
While noting the
historical link between religion, culture and its "plentiful" dog population,
it's worth considering how important the Olympic Games are to Greece's
heritage.
Chronologically, Ancient Greece ran on a four year cycle, so each fourth
year heralded the "Olympiad" and a huge festival was held to mark the
occasion. Only native, free-born Greeks were allowed to qualify for its
festival games, which was principally a religious event to celebrate the
god Zeus. In fact, religious sacrifices took place on the first day of
the Olympic proceedings, and dogs in all probability were used for this
purpose. The games were held solely in Greece for perhaps as long as sixteen
hundred years, and were so important that regional wars were stopped so
everyone could attend.
In 394 AD the games came to an end.
It wouldn't be until fifteen hundred years later that the British first
rekindled the idea of the Olympic Games. They weren't to be fully restored
until the last decade of the 19th century, firstly through the foundation
of the National Olympian Society in Britain, then followed by the efforts
of an enthusiastic Frenchman called Baron Pierre Coubertin. It was through
Coubertin that the International Olympic Committee (IOC) was finally born.
Eventually, Coubertin and the IOC approached Greece to host the first
modern Olympics, but strangely, the Greek government resisted the idea
to begin with, until Georgios Averoff of Alexandria donated almost a million
gold drachmas to build a stadium in Athens. And so in 1896 the first modern
Olympic Games were opened by the King of Greece himself.
In August 2004 the games of the XXVIII Olympiad came home to Greece
for the first time after 108 years absence.
The Greeks took unprecedented
measures to make sure that their 2004 games would be the ultimate spectacle
of world focus. The government put up strong resistance to any speculation
that terrorism might jeopardise the games, and played down the bombing
of an Athens police station exactly 100 days before the games opening.
However, the IOC had for the first time insured against full or partial
cancellation of the games for 93 million dollars. At the same time the
Greeks spent an unprecedented one billion euros on Olympic security -
around four times more than Australia spent for the 2000 games.
The Greeks were entirely focused on presenting a glossy cultural image
to its international visitors - and with clearly no role for its stray
dog and cat population. The result was that Athens pulled out all the
stops as "unknown" parties "cleansed" the streets using poison. This was
carried out with the minimum of fuss so not to draw the attention of the
international community.
Animal protection groups claim that more than 3,000 stray animals were
slaughtered in Athens during August 2003 while the city took its annual
vacation. On New Years Day 2003, sixty dogs and cats - victims of balls
of meat laced with strychnine - were found dead in the famous Athens National
Gardens. With around 15,000 street animals in the capital alone, rescue
groups were understandably nervous about how the remainder would be "managed"
as the games got closer.
In fact, Greek authorities wil always strongly deny responsibility for
any culling, whether during a major event or not - as does its tourist
information, which no doubt realises the importance of playing down the
animal issue.
In 2003, the Mayors Office of Athens announced plans to address the street
animal crisis involving a sterilization and adoption program. It was also
reported that the Mayor herself had adopted two strays. As part of the
Pre-Olympic propaganda these announcements seemed like hollow gestures
and promises rather than urgent action and protection of their animals.
Instead, all signs indicated that a British style animal welfare tactic
of "out of sight, out of mind" was being exercised on the streets around
Olympic venues before it was more commonly realised how the stray animal
problem was being gruesomely addressed.
Some animal lovers took matters into their own hands, and while the rest
of Greece polished up its appearance before the games, there were stories
of both Greeks and foreigners trying to smuggle strays out of the country
by any means possible to save them from a slow, painful death.
During the last days before the Olympic opening ceremony Greek animal
rescuers were saying"... as far as Olympic visitors are concerned
everything looks perfect. Nice streets, corners, stadiums ... but
in fact there is poison all over the place and Athens is eerily void of
stray animals". Continued
>
Continued
... click here for next page>
Pride, Poison and Prejudice around the Parthenon MENU
Part
1 - Main Story
Part 2 - Analysis - Pre-Olympic Jitters?
you
are here> Page
One of Part 3 - Backgrounds of Greece and other countries cited as cruel
to animals
Photo
Page - caution contains upsetting images
This article was last updated in: August 2004
| Further Reading
and Interaction Linked to the Above Subjects |
For more
"Animal News" articles please
click here
For discussion
on these issues see GGL's at VeggieGlobal.com
Related
Reading Reference
Choose either Amazon UK (.co.uk) or Amazon USA (.com)
|
Today's
news that effects tomorrow's world shouldn't be forgotten ...
Top Stories
Animals
Environment
Oceans
Humanitarian
Cosmos
Opinion
Front Page
About
This News Site
Sites News
Looking-Glass
& VeggieGlobal
are free, non-profit resources also bringing you this animal, environmental
and humanitarian news site. Please use CauseClick
to reciprocally help this and other good-causes. Thank you.
Breaking headlines from other
news sites around the world
General
World News
European
Vegetarian and Animal News Agency Headlines
Environment
General
Animal News
Film
Music
Space
Personal
Technology
Computers
Virus Warnings
|
Arts
& Entertainment Newsfeed
|
Brought to you through LOOKING-GLASS.TV
music
- pop
music
- classical
broadcast
industry
film
industry
theatre
european
media
arts
and culture
dance
- ballet
dvd
|
